Program Design: Experience with Opioid Addiction
Experience
with Opioid Addiction
Group Members
|
Roles
|
Commented On
|
Samantha McFadden
|
Introduction, Our Program, Reflection
|
Group 1
|
Katye Wormer
|
Rationale (practical program), tables
|
Group 2
|
Dakota Nicley
|
Rationale (Lit. Review), proofing,
references
|
Group 3
|
Jennifer Stockton
|
n/a
|
Introduction
Reports from AARP (2018) indicated that approximately 2.7
million Americans over age 50 are currently taking opioids for reasons contrary
to or in amounts beyond what was originally prescribed. While there has been a
national emphasis to address the opioid crisis, few efforts are currently in
place that specifically address the impact of the opioid crisis on adults over
age 50 (Orel, 2018). When faced with a social crisis, many times it is up to
the local community to implement practices that help to reduce incidents,
through the way of education, and to aid in the recovery of those suffering.
According to a recent surgeon general statement, many hospitals and people of
authority are not trained to help in aiding addicts, neither do they have
systems in place to do so (Sharfstein, 2017). Our program will help not only
those addicted to opioids, but those in their immediate surroundings with
learning how to not only cope but overcome the devastating effects of this
epidemic. We use an experiential learning approach that focuses on the four
phases of learning: concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract
conceptualization, and active experimentation. This program can be easily
followed by local churches and larger organizations alike. We have taken some
notes from the University of Massachusetts Medical School on how they conduct
their opioid education curriculum, and believe by first sharing what the crisis
is through the eyes of experts and first-hand users (opioid addicts), then
giving the participants in the workshop time to reflect on what they learned
through group communication, and allowing practice in situations through
role-play, then finally releasing the participants back into their
organizations to actively learn by doing, this program will have a profound
effect on this social crisis.
Rationale
Ideas from the literature
Experiential
learning is a learning theory that postulates that knowledge is created through
the transformation of experience (Arnett, Cannon, and Kitchel, 2011; Clark,
2011; Kolb, 1984). Hawtry (2007) characterizes experiential learning by the
integration of participatory learning opportunities that actively engage adult
learners in their education. Examples of experiential learning can include
apprenticeships, intervention and prevention programs, role-playing and
simulations, group work, presentations, workshops, volunteering, studying
abroad, and so on (Piercy, 2013; UT, 2019). To better conceptualize this
theory, Kolb (1984) created a cyclical model that outlined four distinct phases
in experiential learning: concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract
conceptualization, and active experimentation. In this model seen in Figure
1, concrete experience and abstract conceptualization represent the
perception continuum, which focuses on emotional response. Reflective
observation and active experimentation represent the processing continuum,
which has to do with how an individual may approach a task (Clark, 2011).
One
can further break this down to these steps: actively participating in an
experience Ã
reflecting on information learned during an experience à assimilating or
accommodating new information from the experience with old information à putting what was
learned into action (Clark, 2011; Hajshirmohammadi, 2017; Hawtry, 2007). The adult learner can enter the cycle at any of these stages, but the next steps
must follow through the corresponding sequence. As suggested by Clark (2011),
Kolb’s learning styles has six main characteristics:
1.
Learning is a process,
not in terms of outcomes.
2.
Learning is a
continuous process grounded in experience.
3.
Learning requires the
resolution of conflicts that come from prior experiences, beliefs, values, and
attitudes.
4.
Learning is a holistic
process of adaptation to the world.
5.
Learning involves
transactions between the person and the environment.
6.
Learning is the
process of creating knowledge that is the result of the transaction between
social knowledge and personal knowledge
After
gathering and analyzing the literature and related readings on this learning
theory, our proposed program could integrate the experiential learning process
into an interactive opioid addiction workshop for adult learners to receive
hands-on experience engaging, interacting, and helping opioid addicts in a safe
environment. The first step in adapting the process into our program will be
figuring out which stage would be appropriate for the adult learner to start
in. The program could start in the active experimentation phase and administer
a pre-test to adult learners on opioid addiction to measure their prior
knowledge, and later have them take a post-test after completing the program to
compare before and after results.
Alternatively,
our program could start in the concrete experience stage, which would have
adult learners interacting with individuals who have/had an addiction to
opioids through conversation and vicarious observation along with active
listening. This will be achieved in two ways. The program may have guest
speakers who have suffered, or are suffering, from addiction share their
stories and take questions from an audience. There will also be chances for
this population of learners to interact with current and former addicts, as
well as other individuals similar to them in a group setting. Setting up the
concrete experience portion like this would foster connections between content
and experience through real-world interactions and observation between adult
learners. The information that is learned during these sessions will be
supplemented with handouts and other informational documents about opioid
usage, which will be used with teacher guidance in the reflective observation
stage.
These
documents can include information pertaining to opioid statistics, questions
for them to answer, contact information for helplines and specialists,
prevention tips, and any other information that they can learn from. It will be
important for the teacher to supplement all the handouts with some sort of lecture
or other guidance so that they can further make meaning of the information.
From here, they can draw upon the information they learned from interacting
with these people to help other users. Moving forward, the abstract
conceptualization stage would follow this and would be a period of
self-reflection on their experience along with a question and answer section.
This would align with the function of this stage as this is where learners will
assimilate and accommodate new information just learned into existing
knowledge. The learners will reflect on their experiences with the opioid users
they met, answer questions, and actively engage in what they all learned so
they can encode it into their memory for future use.
Finally,
learners will arrive at the active experimentation stage, which involves
allowing the students to actively put their knowledge into practice. This can
be done through a simple approach such as a post-test, or it can be something
like having the adult learners get into groups for a role-play or simulation
involving opioid use. This would allow them to apply all this information they
just learned into a controlled scenario that simulates the real-world
situation, which can give them additional experience to transform into
knowledge. This simulation would further add to the layers of knowledge that
would allow learners to put knowledge into action when a situation arises. The
educator would need to be present to set up and guide the learners along
through their scenes so they can better understand what they are doing.
Having
the learners participate in something like an exit interview or a survey would
also be a good way to get feedback about the program. We could ask questions
pertaining to strengths, weaknesses, and improvements to the program so that we
are constantly trying to improve it. This would also allow us to assess how
students engaged with the program. We may also infer if they successfully
constructed knowledge from the direct experience that they received and can
utilize it along their journey of lifetime learning. This would ensure learners
are getting a chance to reflect on the experience and translate those
experiences into action.
Staying
true to this design, I think that experiential learning would benefit this type
of program. It aligns with the characteristics of experiential learning, and
the steps in this program would logically follow the order of the learning
cycle. The adult learners in this program will be responsible for their
education. Since the cycle can be entered from any stage it opens up many
different possibilities for constructing the framework, which would allow ample
opportunities for adult learners to actively engage with what they are
learning. Research from Munoz, Miller, and Poole (2016) echoes the importance
of engagement in experiential learning. They suggest that engagement increases
when educators can facilitate opportunities for learners to be a professional,
network, and experience real-world events to apply skills and knowledge to
(Munoz, Miller, and Poole, 2016). That is why it will be important for the
program to get students to connect to their education through direct experience
that can transform into knowledge.
Practical
Program
The
University of Massachusetts Medical School [UMMS] has created an opioid
conscious curriculum called Opioid Safe-prescribing Training Immersion [OSTITM]
to teach future doctors and nurses enrolled in the graduate program how to
prescribe opioids safely and responsibility to patients (Pohle, 2019).
Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker created the Medical Education Working Group on
Prescription Drug Misuse to create 10 core competencies created to guarantee
medical students were ready to help prevent and manage prescription drug abuse
(“Opioid conscious curriculum”). This group included the University of
Massachusetts Medical School, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health,
the Massachusetts Medical Society, and the other medical schools in
Massachusetts (“Opioid conscious curriculum”). The curriculum is also available
for other schools to adopt in their medical programs (“Opioid conscious
curriculum”).
What
are the purposes and objectives of the programs?
The
simulations are designed to grow students' interpersonal skills, cognizance of
their thoughts and beliefs, compassion, "equitable care for all patients
suffering from substance misuse and dependency, across the broad and diverse
range of social demography determinants of health" ("About: More
about OSTITM”). This program isn’t just for medical students; it
brings together graduate-level medical and nursing students who are graduating
soon and faculty from the medical and nursing schools at the University of
Massachusetts (“About: More about OSTITM"). The student is
going into each simulated encounter and complete and/or show specific tasks and
skills that are used in the career of a medical professional ("About: More
about OSTITM”). To get the most out of the SP [standardized patient]
encounter, learners must adapt to the setting that is being portrayed, engage
with the SP as they would a "real" patient and practice, and/or
demonstrate the intended skills and competencies, as consistent with the needs
of the case (About: More about OSTITM). The responsibility to treat
these simulations as real is placed on the student. In order for them to learn,
they need to treat these experiments as real-world situations, so that they can
be prepared for their future work in the medical field.
How
are the programs designed?
The
program is designed around the 10 core competencies the Medical Education
Working Group on Prescription Drug Misuse created (Opioid conscious
curriculum). Those 10 core competencies fall under three domains:
1. Preventing drug misuse
2. Treating patients at-risk for use disorders
3. Managing substance use
disorders as a chronic disease (Governor’s Medical Education Working Group on
Prescription Drug Misuse, 2015, p. 5)
The
program puts students in hands-on experiences through simulations, which
promotes active learning, and includes assessments (About: More about OSTITM).
The students will see standardized patients in situations that convey realistic
interactions with patients that these students will someday encounter (About:
More about OSTITM). These simulated encounters can occur with groups
or individually in an environment where students can make mistakes and learn
from them (About: More about OSTITM). The curriculum is overseen by
"clinician-educators," the medicine and nursing schools, and
oversight offices, and it brings in experts in the medical field, community
resources, and state resources, such as the Department of Public Health (About:
More about OSTITM). "Key
to the success of our project is the active engagement of our medical and
nursing students in all aspects of this work, including curriculum development,
faculty development, and implementation planning" (About: More about OSTITM).
What
are the main features you identified from these programs (these features should
reflect or partially reflect the key points of the theory you reviewed)?
Kolb’s
experiential learning model has four phases: reflective observation, abstract
conceptualization, active experimentation, and concrete experience. During
these phases, the learner will observe, experience, plan, and do (Sharlanova,
2004, p. 37). The learner can begin the
cycle at any stage, so for the OSTITM we will review it beginning
with reflective observation (Sharlanova, 2004, p. 37).
The
students in this program go through simulations to experience what happens when
a person comes in after overdosing (University of Massachusetts Medical School
[UMMS], 2017). To prepare for the
simulations, students are to review documents provided to them by professors
and through the school website (Student materials). These materials include the
paperwork that applies to the needs of the patient they'll be working with, but
they also include information to learn about what they'll be incorporating and
accomplishing in these simulations (Student materials). This information falls under the reflective
observation portion of Kolb's cycle. The students are reflecting on the
information they are receiving and trying to think about how they will be
applying it in the future.
Abstract
conceptualization can also occur using the materials and during the simulations.
During this stage, students will answer those questions they have been thinking
about during the reflective observation. They will come up with theories to
process and enact their new knowledge. These will be used during the active
experimentation phase.
The
program outlines different steps for the processes doctors and nurses will go
through when dealing with patients with opioid problems. The Opioid rescue in action (simulation) video
shows a resuscitation of a person who has overdosed. The simulation is very realistic, involving
people portraying the mother of the patient, the emergency medical technician,
social workers, doctors, nurses, and more (UMMS, 2017). In this particular
simulation, the patient is a medical dummy, but real people can serve as
patients for other simulations. The goal of this simulation and others like it
is to provide an experience the students can learn through and take what
they’ve learned and apply it to real-world experiences. This simulation falls
into the active experimentation stage of Kolb’s experiential learning cycle.
The final stage of the cycle is concrete
experience. These medical students begin the OSTITM curriculum when
they are about to graduate (About: More about OSTITM). Medical
students enter their residency after they have completed their third year of
medical school, which is right after they would begin this OSTITM
program (What to expect in medical school).
The students will begin working with real patients at that point, which
would put them into the concrete experience stage.
How
would you like to incorporate some of these features into your design?
Our concrete
experience stage will occur when adult learners speak to real people who have
or have had an addiction to opioids. Using the information they learn, we will
design a reflective observation stage they take what they have learned from
these real people and supplement it with documents about opioid usage, such as
the OSTITM program does with the materials presented to students.
The materials they receive will include questions for them to ask themselves
and areas they can create their own questions. We need to provide a safe place
where the learners can make mistakes. We need to provide guidance during the
reflection.
The
abstract conceptualization phase could occur just as it does in the OSTITM
program: during the end of reflective observation and the beginning of active
experimentation. As they are reflecting on their experience with real-life
people who have had an opioid dependency, they will be answering questions we
have asked and will be asking themselves questions about what they have
learned. As they begin to answer these questions, they will move into the
abstract conceptualization phase. They will need to answer these questions so
they can know how to interact with people who misuse opioids in the
future.
The
OSTITM program puts students into simulations where they can work
with actors who have an opioid dependency. We could create role-playing
scenarios where members of each group work with a person who previously misused
opioids. Each of these people would have key points to go touch on, such as
reasons for their usage, how they became users, why they cannot or do not want
to stop. Then the rest of the learners would use the concepts and answers they
came up within the abstract conceptualization phase to work with these actors
to discover if they could help this person overcome and/or prevent misusing
opioids. Having people who have overcome opioid dependency would create a level
of realness and offer knowledge that regular actors would not have.
Our
Program: Opioid Addiction Workshop
As mentioned before, experiential learning is a process
composed of concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract
conceptualization, and active experimentation. Our opioid addiction workshop is
aimed at better educating the community on addiction, as well as providing
information on how to best get help for those suffering from addiction.
Step 1: Concrete
Experience
Guest speakers will kick off our workshop
sharing personal as well as professional stories on opioid addiction. These
speakers will range in knowledge from book smarts to street smarts and may
include professors, social workers, psychologists, and addicts themselves.
Participants will be given a schedule to tentatively follow in which speakers
will present and time will be given for interactions with current and prior
addicts to further answer any questions. To ensure connections are made, we
will divide participants into groups to work hands-on with current addicts. All
information obtained in these workshops will be supplemented with handouts that
refer to the topics at hand, and these can be further utilized once the
participants reach the reflection stage of experiential learning.
Step 2: Reflective
Observation
The handouts, which will include information
such as statistics, how addiction begins, when and how people cave to try
opioids for the first time, likely targets of opioid addiction, and so on.
During our program, the instructor will give follow up information to support
the handout materials. This will help adult learners to grasp a deeper
understanding of the written materials. After receiving the materials and the
lecture, the learner will have time to hear from different addicts on their
personal experiences with addiction. After this, the learner will be given time
to reflect on what they have seen, heard, and takeaways thus far. These ideas
will all be documented in their personal notebook, which they will take home
with them for further reflection and implementation.
Step 3: Abstract
Conceptualization
Assimilating and accommodating the new information is an
important part of experiential learning and ensuring that social change is
possible. After reflecting on their thoughts, the learner will be engaged in a
question and answer session with current addicts. Each learner will be
encouraged to come with 3-5 questions for the addicts. These questions should
be items that challenge the learner's previous knowledge when compared to what
was learned from the lectures. For example, one may come to the workshop with a
certain stereotype of addicts, but when confronted with a different
"type" of an addict at the workshop, they will need to work through
their previous thoughts, and open communication may be the best route.
Step 4: Active Experimentation
The
last step in our program will require the adult learner to be motivated to take
the information learned during the workshop back home and implement what was taught/experienced.
This could look in many ways, depending on the profession. If a pastor came
through our program, his/her take away from the program could be the basis of
their sermons during service for the next month helping to debunk myths about
addicts. For a social worker, their active experimentation may be to take a
different approach with their clients which includes open communication to get
to the route of their motivation to use the drugs. For an elementary teacher,
this information may be stored for a time when a student has a parent addicted
to opioids.
Reflection
Highlights
Our program is focused on an important social
issue in our current society. Since there is limited funding to the education
and reduction efforts on this issue, our program is ideal to fit both the
financial limits as well as being hands-on so people can gain a deeper
knowledge and different perspective on the issue. By utilizing experiential
learning we are challenging people to assimilate and accommodate new knowledge,
not just within their head, but also by actively engaging in activities during
and after the workshop.
Process
I think one of the biggest
obstacles for our group on this assignment was losing a group member with
little time to adjust our plan. We made our group plan a month ago with clear
cut goals and timelines to stay the course, and last minute we realized we were
down a groupmate. A suggestion is to check the group plan regularly (at least
twice a week), to ensure group members are meeting deadlines. Had we not been
on top of our group plan, we likely would have missed the opportunity to
correct our course before it was too late.
Our first step in completing this project was to refer to
the group plan for responsibilities and the deadline for each section to be
completed. Communicating through an email thread really helped to keep each of
us up to date on where we were at on our perspective sections. Creating a word
document and just attaching it to the email thread as we completed a section to
build our document proved helpful.
Tables
Main
Themes/Ideas in Literature
|
Application
of main ideas in practice
|
The experiential learning model.
|
Our process is based on this
cycle.
|
Learning is a process, not an
outcome.
|
Students would work toward gaining
knowledge not a grade.
|
Concrete experience.
|
Students will listen to speakers to understand their
experiences.
|
Engaging in reflective observation
|
Our program will have the
educators guide our learners through the reflective process by walking them
through the information they have learned and by asking questions of them.
|
Rationales
|
Purpose/Objective
|
Learning Environment
|
Activities
|
Methods/Tools/Strategies
|
Concrete Experience (actively
participating in experience)
|
To create knowledge through a
real-world situation
|
Confidential environment where
learners hear from people with real-world experience with addiction.
|
Lecture, question and answer time,
group time with current addicts to discuss their experiences
|
We will enlist a variety of
speakers to discuss their experiences to provide a plethora of viewpoints. We will have a schedule for learners to follow to keep them on task. Group
discussions will be used to facilitate openness.
|
Reflective Observation (contemplation
on information learned during prior stage(s))
|
To allow learners time to process
what they have learned
|
Group discussion and individual
reflection on materials handed out by educators
|
Review handouts, discuss with
group, hear from addicts about their personal experiences with addiction
|
Learners will have a personal
notebook for reflection and applying what they have learned to what they have heard. They will receive materials with information about addiction and why opioids are so addictive.
|
Abstract Conceptualization
(combining and possibly replacing the old information with new information)
|
To make learners take the
information they already know and combine it or replace it with the new
information they are learning
|
Group discussion and sometimes one-on-one
environments. All questions actively encouraged
|
Question and answer sessions with
addicts
|
We will encourage each participant
to come up with 3-5 questions during the reflection stage that they will then
ask during this stage.
|
Active Experimentation (putting
what is learned into action)
|
To apply what they learned into
their jobs and every day lives
|
Outside of the program, their
normal lives
|
Whatever they will be doing
outside of the workshop
|
We will give them physical
materials to take with them to use for reference whenever they are working with people with addiction. We will provide resources (groups, hotlines,
websites) they can use whenever they are in the real world.
|
References
Arnett, E. S., Cannon, G. J.,
Kitchel, A. (2011). Experiential learning curricular development model for
stimulating student interest in green collar careers. Online Journal of
Workforce Education and Development, 5(1), 1-23.
Clark, D. (2011). Kolb’s
Learning Styles and Experiential Learning Model. Retrieved from
http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/styles/kolb.html/.
Governor’s Medical Education
Working Group on Prescription Drug Misuse. (2015). Medical education core competencies for the prevention and management
of prescription drug misuse [PDF file]. Retrieved from
http://www.massmed.org/Patient-Care/Health-Topics/Opioids/Medical-Education-Core-Competencies-for-the-Prevention-and-Management-of-Prescription-Drug-Misuse/.
Hajshirmohammadi, A. (2017).
Incorporating experiential learning in engineering courses. IEEE
Communications Magazine, 55(1), 166-169.
Hawtry, K. (2007). Using
experiential learning techniques. The Journal of Economic Education 38(2),
143-152.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential
learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood
Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Munoz, L., Miller, R., Poole,
M. S. (2016). Professional student organizations and experiential learning
activities: What drives student intentions to participate? Journal of
Education for Business 91(1), 45-51.
Orel, N. (2018). Impact of
opioid crisis on middle-aged and older adults: Addressing through prevention
education. Innovation in Aging, 2(1).
Piercy, N. (2013).
Evaluating experiential learning in the business context: Contributions to
group-based and cross-functional working. Innovations in Education and
Teaching International, 50(2), 202-213.
Pohle, A. (2019). Medical schools look to educate the next
generation of doctors on pain. WBUR 90.9. Retrieved from
https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2019/05/28/medical-schools-opioid-addiction-pain-treatment/.
Sharfstein, J. (2017). The
opioid crisis from research to practice. The Milbank Quarterly, 95(1),
24-27.
Sharlanova, V. (2004).
Experiential learning. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 2(4), 36-39.
The University of Tennessee
Knoxville. (2019). Resource Guide [PDF file]. Retrieved from https://experiencelearning.utk.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2018/04/442930-ELResourceBookUpdate-v2.0accessible-smaller.pdf/.
University of Massachusetts
Medical School. [UMass Medical School]. (2017, February 17). Opioid rescue
in action (simulation). [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuIOltSBOMU&feature=youtu.be/.
University of Massachusetts
Medical School. (n.d.). More about OSTI.
Retrieved from https://www.umassmed.edu/opioid/about/.
University of Massachusetts
Medical School (n.d.). Opioid.
Retrieved from https://www.umassmed.edu/opioid/.
University of Massachusetts
Medical School. (2019). Student Materials.
Retrieved from https://www.umassmed.edu/opioid/students/student-materials/.
Association of American
Medical Colleges (n.d.). What to Expect
in Medical School. Retrieved from
https://students-residents.aamc.org/choosing-medical-career/article/what-expect-medical-school/.

Group 4,
ReplyDeleteYour program is extremely relevant to the current crisis our nation is facing. Choosing this subject matter is a great way for students to utilize experiential learning, but also learn about and how to work toward reducing the casualties and people affected by the threat of opioids. I think your goals and objectives are plausible and make sense. The fact that you can start at any stage is interesting and great for adult learners, as I think adaptability is important and they are often on different levels of knowledge.
Your steps do a great job of covering a variety of learning styles, including written hard copies, kinetically is you decided to use the role-pay you mentioned, and visual and auditory stimulation from the guest speakers and question panel for the addicts. I really like how your guest speakers will vary from academics to addicts themselves. I think a variety of perspective provides a good foundation.
I’m sorry to hear you lost a group mate. That can be very stressful, but it seems like you handled it well and produced a great program. Great job!
- Krista Altland
I really liked your program plan! Your breakdown of the steps for your opioid addiction workshop was clear and easy to follow. I think starting the workshop with the concrete experience with guest speakers who can share personal stories of either dealing or working with opioid addiction is a great start. That can really help with the learning experience and make it relate to those attending. I also liked how you personalized the active experimentation step to the individual participants. By pointing out the differences between if a pastor or social worker attended and how their take away may be different due to their line of work. I too want to applaud you guys for do such a great job after being down a group member!
ReplyDeleteI too really liked your program plan and that you selected a topic that is in dire need to be addressed within our nation currently. Having worked with addicts, I feel the hardest part of implementing this program will be getting those who are currently addicted to opioids engaged as many do not realize they have a problem at the time of addiction. I support the efforts of the program design and felt it was clearly outlined to help with the implementation process.
ReplyDeleteI'm also sorry to hear that you lost one of your group mates. That is frustrating and is something that I can relate to as our group assumes that we also lost a group mate during this process. Your program design does not appear to have been compromised from this loss so kudos to those who stepped up and filled in to ensure all of the missing pieces were covered.
I don't know why my previous post did not publish my name as it indicates reply as: deannazimmer@gmail.com so I apologize for the duplicate post. This is Deanna Zimmer just in case it publishes as Unknown again.
DeleteI too really liked your program plan and that you selected a topic that is in dire need to be addressed within our nation currently. Having worked with addicts, I feel the hardest part of implementing this program will be getting those who are currently addicted to opioids engaged as many do not realize they have a problem at the time of addiction. I support the efforts of the program design and felt it was clearly outlined to help with the implementation process.
I'm also sorry to hear that you lost one of your group mates. That is frustrating and is something that I can relate to as our group assumes that we also lost a group mate during this process. Your program design does not appear to have been compromised from this loss so kudos to those who stepped up and filled in to ensure all of the missing pieces were covered.
I have been through some similar training to this when hubby and I had our training to be foster parents years ago. We had information and speakers that were from the social workers, former foster kids, former foster parents, and parents who had temporarily lost custody of their kids. This was very valuable. Great idea for your concrete stage.
ReplyDeleteI also appreciate you including the visual of the Experiential Learning Cycle. As a visual learner, this was extremely helpful for me to understand the process you are using.
One suggestion I have is, in Step 1 when you have various speakers, to also include friends and/or family members of addicts.
I agree that this is a very relevant topic. I have been taking opioids for 5 years for some severe chronic health situations and I am extremely careful with it. My family consistently checks in with me to keep it a safe zone. My goal each month is to have as much left over as possible on the date I can refill it. I ration it out for more use on days when I cannot lay around with ice packs and heating pads. I am severely allergic to over the counter pain meds, so this med is one of few options---all being opioids. I tread very carefully!
Additionally, my hubby and I have coached over 50 people in our home over the years to help them escape lives of addiction. This is another reason I think your program is worthwhile.
Your suggestion for including family and friends is a good one. We will try to incorporate that. Thanks!
Delete